TOPIC |
YEAR |
AUTHORS |
SUBJECTS |
DESIGN |
COMMENTS/ RESULTS |
Ocular Movements Among Individuals with Autism Pre- and Post-Auditory Integration Training |
1993 |
Margaret P. Creedon in collaboration with Stephen M. Edelson and Janice E. Scharre |
22 ASD subjects
No control group |
open-clinical study, visual tracking movements and optokinetic nystagmus (a visual reflex) were assessed.
Parents completed the FAPC and the ABC-1. |
Significant improvements were seen in horizontal tracking immediately following AIT and in both horizontal and vertical tracking 3 months post-AIT No changes were seen in optokinetic nystagmus.
The FAPC indicated significant improvement at 3 months post-AIT, and the ABC-1 indicated significant improvement both immediately following and 3 months post-AIT. |
Study of the Effects of Auditory Integration Training in Autism |
1993 |
Dawn Cortez-McKee and J. Panksepp |
33 ASD
No control group |
open-trial clinical study.
Participants were assessed using multiple measures prior to, at 1-week, 1-month, and 3 months following AIT. The measures included: ABC-1, BSE, CARS, CPRS, FAPC, and SIBQ. |
Significant improvement was seen on all of the measures, except the FAPC, at the one- and three-month follow-up assessment periods.
Critique:- FAPC is a survey tool, not a suitable instrument to measure change after AIT. |
Study 1 of the Effects of AIT in Autism |
1993 |
Tina K. Veale |
5 ASD
5 controls, matched according to checklists right |
In a double-blind placebo pilot study. Parents completed the ABC-1, the CPRC, and the FAPC. These instruments were completed prior to, one month following, and three months following AIT. |
Positive trends indicating improvement in the experimental group were seen at three months following AIT for all three evaluation forms. |
Study 2 of the Effects of AIT in Autism |
1993 |
Tina K. Veale |
46 ASD
No controls |
An open clinical study
Parents completed the ABC-1, CPRS, FAPC as well as the Autistic Behaviour Composite Checklist and Profile. |
Significant improvements were observed at one month and six months following AIT.
Some of the behavioural changes included: reductions in hyperactivity, social withdrawal, auditory problems, restlessness, and anxiety. |
Non-Pharmaco-logical Techniques in the Treatment of Brain Dysfunction |
1994 |
J.M. Gerth, S. A. Barton, H. F. Engler, A. C. Heller, D. Freides, and J. Blalock |
10 children with auditory-based learning deficits Eight of the ten had also been diagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorder. |
Subjects were given a series of diagnostic tests, and parents were requested to complete several questionnaires.
Two subscales from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery test were used to evaluate changes in auditory processing. |
The Sound Blending scale and the Incomplete Words scale, indicated an improvement of one standard deviation or more in 4 of the 10 subjects, and moderate improvement in two other subjects. |
Auditory Processing Skills and Auditory Integration Training in Children with ADD |
1994 |
Donna Geffner, Jay R. Lucker, Ann Gordon and Dolores A. DiStasio |
16 children with ADD/H. |
This study investigated changes in audition and language. A large number of tests were employed to evaluate changes as a result of AIT, e.g. audiometric threshold testing, tolerance for tones and speech, speech recognition in quiet and noise conditions, and the (GFW) Test
Post-assessments were conducted within 3 months following AIT. |
Significant improvement was observed in the subjects’ tolerance to tones and speech, speech recognition in the noise condition, and in listening skills in the GFW Auditory
Selective Attention Test and subscales from the Detroit Test of Learning Aptitude, (attention span for unrelated words, and attention span for related words.) |
Positron Emission Tomography Measure of Modified Auditory Integration Therapy: A Case Study |
1994 |
Jacqueline M. Cimorelli and Melanie K. Highfill |
A single-subject
an 8-year old male with mental retardation and autism |
Investigated changes in brain functioning post=AIT using Positron Emissions Test (PET) Scan technology. PET scans were conducted prior to a second set of AIT (baseline), 1 day after and 6 months after AIT. |
The results at both the one-day and 6-month follow-up indicated a normalization of brain wave activity, including a decrease in hyper-metabolism in the frontal lobe and an increase in activity in the occipital lobe. |
Changes in Unilateral and Bilateral Sound Sensitivity as a Result of Auditory Integration Training |
1994 |
Deborah Woodward |
60 with ASD
No controls |
Uncomfortable loudness level (UCL) measurements were performed prior to and immediately following AIT. |
Following AIT, the monaural tolerance level to each ear increased 13 = 15 dBHTL, (statistically significant).
Also the binaural tolerance level indicated a more normal response. |
Parental Perceptions of Change Following Auditory Integration Training for Autism |
1994 |
Dana Monville and Nickola Nelson |
40 surveyed parents |
Reports of Parent Survey |
25 (63%) reported an increase in attention span;
25 (63%) reported a decrease in sound sensitivity;
12 (30%) reported an increase in language.
4 parents (10%) reported an increase in tantrums and aggression. |
Auditory Integration Training |
1994 |
Dr. Jane R. Madell and D. E. Rose |
4 children, ASD/ PDD/ Learning Disabilities |
Audiological and behavioural assessments were used. |
Audiograms of all 4 children showed improvement following AIT (i.e., a decrease in variability).
Behavioural improvement was observed in 3 of the 4 children:
increased calmness
decreased sound sensitivity,
improvements in speech/language
improved word recognition in noise. |
The Effects of Auditory Integration Therapy on Central Auditory Processing |
1994 |
B Huskey, K Barnett, and J M. Cimorelli |
6 exp
6 controls |
An experimental study of 2 auditory processing tasks: the SSW test and the Phonemic Synthesis Test (PST). |
Pre- AIT and post-tests were given at 4 to 6 weeks, and at 8 to 12 weeks.
SSW test,: no improvements at 4 to 6 weeks post- AIT, but improvements on the total score and on the left competing condition at 8 to 12 weeks in the exp subjects following AIT.
No changes in the results from the PST. |
Clinical Outcome Evaluation: Auditory Integration Training |
1994 |
J. H. Rudy, S. S. Morgan, and M. Shepard |
13 exp subjects
No controls |
A clinical study, subjects diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or central auditory processing dysfunction (CAPD) tested pre-, immediately following, and 3 months post-AIT.: hearing acuity, central auditory processing (SSW, SCAN), auditory evoked potentials (P200 and P300), language(CELF-R), and intelligence (TONI). |
Significant improvements in the SSW, SCAN, and CELF-R, and no change in the TONI.
3 months post-AIT, there were additional improvements in the SSW and CELF-R, but no further change in the SCAN. There was also a significant improvement in the TONI.
An analysis of the P200 ERP indicated a significant change in amplitude but no change in the P300 latency. |
A Pilot Study of AIT in Autism |
1995 |
Rimland B., Edelson S. |
18 children and adolescents with ASD |
Follow-up after 3 months. |
Diminished aberrant behaviour but no change in Sound Sensitivity. |
Long-Term Effects of Auditory Integration Training Comparing Treated and Non-Treated Children |
1996 |
Donna Geffner, Jay R. Lucker, and Ann Gordon |
10 had AIT (exp)
10 controls |
A study: one-year follow-up evaluation of children with Attention Deficit Disorder. A tolerance testing procedure for ‘uncomfortable’ listening levels was used. |
Improvement was observed for the AIT group, but no change in the control group.
Additionally, tests evaluating speech recognition in noise and auditory-language processing showed improvement for those in the AIT group but not for those in the control group. |
ANIMAL STUDIES |
1995 |
M. Waldhoer, J. Panksepp, D. Pruitt, M. Vaningan, D. McKee, J. Rossi III, and J. Lindsey
Jaak Panksepp, J. Ross III, & T.K. Narayanan |
Newborn chicks and AIT |
|
The data suggests that AIT may modify serotonergic tone in the brain. Panksepp suggests such music arouses and activates attentional circuits in the brain
These findings indicate that listening to music produced neurochemical changes. |
The Effects of Auditory Integration Training for Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) |
1996 |
Karen A. Yencer |
36 exp and controls |
36 children diagnosed with central auditory processing disorder. Children with autism, pervasive developmental disorder (PDD), and multiple-handicaps were excluded from the study. |
Testing prior and 1 month after AIT. Standard audiometric testing, the SSW test, the Phonemic Synthesis test, the Standard Progressive Matrices test, FAPC, auditory brainstem response (ABR), event-related potential (P300), and a speech-in-noise test.
The P300 analyses indicated some improvement in the AIT condition (mean latency from 366.2 msec. to 348.5 msec.) versus a slight worsening in the placebo condition (mean latency from 400.8 msec. to 402.2 msec.).
Critique – post-AIT testing at 4 weeks instead of the required 3 to 6 months! |
The Long-Term Effects of Auditory Training on Children with Autism |
1996 |
Sue Bettison |
80 , in 2 groups, exp / control,
3-17 years of age, with autism or Asperger syndrome and mild to severe distress in the presence of some sounds. |
Measures used were the Hearing Sensitivity questionnaire (HSQ) – an informal survey devised by Bernard Rimland but not validated nor scorable..
Also used the Developmental Behavior Checklist. |
No difference between AIT and normal music results. Improvement in both conditions, Improvements in sensitivity as well as IQ.
Critique: severe shortcomings, The HSQ was designed only as a survey of sound sensitivity in the autism population and not an instrument to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Is unstandardized , lacking even face validity |
Epileptic Activity in Autism and Acquired Aphasia: A Study Using Magneto-Encephalography |
1997 |
Jeffrey D. Lewine, Sherri L. Provencal, John T. Davis, and William W. Orrison, |
2 subjects |
Magnetoencephalography and EEG recordings were used to measure electrical activity in the brain in 1 child with dyslexia and o1 high-functioning autistic adult. |
Baseline recordings demonstrated larger than normal responses in the areas associated with hyperacusis.
Following AIT, a more normalized balance or symmetry in electrical activity was observed |
The Efficacy of Auditory Integration Training: A Double Blind Study |
1997 |
William Zollweg, Vere Vance, and David Palm |
30 participants assigned at random to experimental AIT group or a placebo-control group.
Mild to profound Mental handicap , some with ASD. |
A double-blind research design, Evaluations using audiometric tests, a Loudness Discomfort Level test, and the ABC-1 at 3, 6, and 9 months following AIT. |
No differences were found between the AIT and control groups.
Critique (AIT is not recommended for MD)
Loudness incorrectly set as high as 122 dB SPL
27% were given wrong narrow-band filters. |
Auditory Integration Training in Children with Autism: Brief Report of an Open Pilot Study |
1997 |
C. Gillberg, M. Johansson, S. Steffenberg, and O. Berlin |
9 pupils with ASD
No controls |
9-month follow-up period, using ABC and the ABC Sensory Subscale. |
8 of the 9 children showed improvement on the Autism Behaviour Checklist (ABC) total score, and 7 of 9 children showed improvement on the ABC sensory subscale. |
Auditory Integration Training: A Double-Blind Study of Behavioral, Electro-Physciological, and Audiometic Effects in Autistic Subjects |
1999 |
S. M. Edelson, D. Arin, Margaret Bauman, S. E. Lukas, Jane H. Rudy, M. Sholar, and Bernard Rimland |
19 ASD assigned at random to exp/control, Double blind |
All evaluations were ‘blind’ to group assignment.
Behavioral, electro-physiological, and audiometric measures were assessed prior to and following AIT( all had abnormal ERP’s)
Of the 19 subjects, three experimental group and two placebo group subjects were able to cooperate with the auditory P300 (ERP) task |
A significant improvement was observed in behavioral problems 3-month follow-up in exp..
Electrophysiological: Three months following AIT, all three exp subjects tested showed a dramatic improvement in their auditory P300 ERP. Post-AIT.
No improvement was seen in the placebo group. |
Auditory Integration Training and Autism: Two Case Studies |
1999 |
Mark Morgan Brown |
2 subjects ASD |
Report of Observations made at three and six months |
following AIT. Improvements in attention, arousal and sensory modulation, balance and movement perception, praxis and sequencing, speech and language, social – emotional maturity, and eye control. |
The Effects of Auditory Integration Training on Children Diagnosed with Attention Deficit /Hyperactivity Disorder: A Pilot Study |
2000 |
Wayne J. Kirby |
5 experimental,
5 controls |
A placebo-control design, Subjects were assessed using the Auditory Continuous Performance Test (ACPT) prior to and 3 months following AIT. |
Comparison of the two groups at 3months post-AIT indicated a statistically significant reduction in the total number of errors for those in the AIT group.
Improvement on the impulsivity and inattention scores were not significantly significant. |